Hilgemann – Caps Blog #4
According
to Martin, the U-curve theory posits that migrants go through three phases of
cultural transition: excitement, shock, and adjustment. Upon analysis, the
U-curve can be made to fit most migration situations. In the case of voluntary
migration, excitement is certainly a factor. The cultural move is something
that likely has been planned for some time. Thus, the individual would be
anxious anxious to go through with it and excited after it occurs. The
excitement factor doesn’t always fit so well with forced migration. Although a
migrant may be happy to leave behind whatever form of strife is uprooting them,
they are much more likely to regret having to leave their homeland behind. This
is especially true if family and other close relatives are left behind. The
second stage, culture shock, is felt by everyone in one form or another.
Relatively speaking, culture shock is a short term phenomenon with significant
impact. Generally, the more immersed one becomes in another culture the more
likely that person is to experience culture shock. Martin uses the example of
military personal on US bases in other countries. They are not very likely to
feel culture shock because they have limited contact with indigenous cultures.
The third stage is adjustment. Adjustment occurs when migrants learn the rules
and customs of the new cultures. According to the referenced articles, this
stage can become difficult when migrants are not familiar with the local languages.
This is particularly true when refugees are relocated and need to find jobs. For
example, Moe Free, a refugee from Burma, has described his issues in adapting to
the American culture and finding work because of language issues (Myers, 2011).
Conversely, sometimes people are forced to adjust as in the case where a
student learns language and cultural norms by attending classes every day. This
case is epitomized by Khu Say, a 14 year old student who has become more
proficient in English than his parents (Stefankiewicz, 2012).
According
to Martin, intercultural conflicts are often caused by differences in values
(2012). Thus, the most effective tool to assist intercultural transitions is
simply knowledge. For example, Scandinavian countries have less gender specific
roles and countries like Great Britain dislike rules and are less formal in
their dealings. Refugees cannot be expected to know all of these cultural
nuances. Thus, it is important to provide them with background information on
their adopted cultures. By informing migrants about what to expect once they
are introduced to a new culture, they are more likely to become comfortable in
their new setting. This can lead to
increased intercultural communication between the migrants and those indigenous
to the area, thus accelerating the U-curve and providing for a more comfortable
transitional experience.
On a
less serious note, following is one of David Letterman’s infamous Top Ten
lists. This one parodies differences between Americans and Brits. Oftentimes,
satire is the best way to approach a difficult situation and can be a good way
to learn about another culture in general.
College Profile: University of Nebraska - Lincoln. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.collegedata.com
Martin,
J.N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2012). Intercultural communication in contexts
(6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Myers, E. (2011, December 05). Lincoln community home for refugees from around the world. Retrieved from
http://www.newsnetnebraska.org/
Stefankiewicz, R. (2012, May 13). Lincoln's refugee students find language barriers when doing
homework. Retrieved from
http://journalstar.com/
I swear I have more issues getting that text formatting correct than anything else...
ReplyDeleteYes it is totally true that refugees cannot be expected to know all of these cultural nuances. They come from different countries so we should expect that they also would have different perspectives and cultures. People should help the refugees by educating them about the new place.
ReplyDelete